In my last post The Big Dollop called for the resignation David Laws the Lib Dem Chief Secretary to the Treasury – a call which was purely based on the fact that he had broken certain rules concerning an alleged exploitation of the expenses system afforded to MP’s who have constituencies out with the city of London.
In light of the previous public furore concerning the expenses fiasco which enveloped the last session of parliament Mr Laws to his credit has adopted a pragmatic view and realised that his position was untenable and quite rightly tendered his resignation from his post in David Cameron’s cabinet.
One aspect of this sorry saga has been the manner in which those who are in support of the present coalition government have tried to engender a point of view that Mr Laws was somehow hounded out of office just because he happens to be a homosexual and as such, a victim of circumstances which would not have occurred if his lover was female.
There has even been a school of thought presented in the blogosphere that he somehow saved the tax payer a considerable amount of money by renting a room from his supposed landlord instead of purchasing a house and getting the tax payer to pay the full second home allowance.
It is the humble opinion of the Big Dollop that these people are deliberately trying to divert attention away from the simple fact that Mr Laws broke the rules concerning expenses for which he was eligible as an MP from out with the city of London and are trying to portray it as a homophobic attack on his person.
Indeed the consensus which has been put forward is that Mr Laws has been punished simply because he tried to keep his sexuality a private matter, however what I find difficult to comprehend is that if I was in his position and wanted to keep a measure of confidentiality concerning my lifestyle out of the public domain, the last thing I would have done was to have used tax payers money to pay the rent to my lover.
It would be truculent of the Big Dollop if I did not recognise Mr Laws was totally sincere in his explanation concerning the circumstances pertaining to his living arrangements whilst working in London on parliamentary business.
It would be truculent of the Big Dollop if I did not recognise Mr Laws was totally sincere in his explanation concerning the circumstances pertaining to his living arrangements whilst working in London on parliamentary business.
By resigning as speedily as he has done, he has demonstrated he is a man with a social conscience and one with more than a modicum of integrity, however I just cannot go along with the notion that concerns for his privacy can somehow mitigate his inappropriate actions regarding what is in essence - a fraudulent claim for expenses.
,











